Media is a way to inform people about the incidents which happens around them. The presentation of these events should be similar in many ways, at least the context, when we compare different media outlets; because of the fact that its for people to get information. For example if a newspaper talks about an incident as a development and the other one in the same city talks about it in a way of going back; it won’t be good because many people don’t read more than one newspapers. With that there will be only a point of view of the writer and it’s influence will be huge on readers. Only the consumers of more than one outlets will be able to think about it clearly because of having different opinions and capibility of thinking over all.
However this is something which can’t be avoided easily. Since the owners, writers, producers are human beings; their ideas will be in there no matter what will happen. Also, in some advertisements of news; they say that they are the most neutral ones while producing the news. That’s a quite important fact and something which can’t be attained easily. Even in books, novels this is something which is accepted even before reading it. Even if the writers talks about their past, they have the fear of not being liked and if it’s their own lives, they can go for some events which didn’t happen.
The influence of the creator of the media makes people uncomfortable mostly if its about politics because some people have some lines which don’t be willing to pass and when they read what they believe or know wrong, it makes them feel uncomfortable. It’s not only makes them feel in that way but with this way the real aim of media goes out of their boundries.
1 response so far ↓
1
jo
// Jan 8, 2009 at 9:19 am
Actually as you say if people were to read more than one paper (not owned by the same person) maybe they might be provoked in to thinking about what is really going on….but….
Leave a Comment